Investment review
Test whether the controls and operating model fit the risks this business is likely to face after investment.
Structured integrity-risk analysis
Ranulph maps the risks that fit the business, reviews documents and data for gaps and weaknesses, then turns the findings into better questions and practical next steps.
The need
Context gets flattened into generic benchmarks. Documents, data and public-source material sit in separate places. By the end, you may have more material than before, but not a clearer view of the real exposure, the control gaps or the right next step.
Where it helps
The same structured review can be used in different ways, depending on what you need to test, clarify or prioritise.
Test whether the controls and operating model fit the risks this business is likely to face after investment.
Use it as a more accessible starting point for reviewing documents, data and transactions for inconsistencies, weaknesses and areas that need closer examination.
Bring overlapping or repeated requests into one coherent set of responses.
Clarify what the concern is about, what should be checked first and where further review may be needed.
Sources and framework
Ranulph uses structured analysis to organise information, compare it with known integrity-risk patterns and highlight anomalies or questions that may warrant closer examination. Where source material is used, findings link back to it.
A structured integrity-risk framework developed through analysis of hundreds of fraud, corruption and governance cases.
Ranulph monitors selected public sources and keeps information linked to its origin.
Every source feeding the Risk Index is approved by Ethics Insight. Individual self-service outputs are not automatically reviewed by a person. Senior specialist review can be included when you work directly with Ethics Insight.
How the review is structured
Ranulph brings context, documents, data and public-source material into one structured review. It helps turn heavy material into a clearer first view of exposure, gaps, follow-up questions and practical next steps.
Understand what the business does, where it operates, who it works with and how that shapes the risks it is likely to face. Review documents and data for gaps, weaknesses and areas that need further analysis.
Draft targeted, right-sized follow-up questions, then identify where controls, implementation, or practice fall short and turn that into a clear, prioritised action plan.
Bring overlapping or repeated requests into one coherent set of responses, while making shared points, differences and conflicts easier to see.
Support ongoing monitoring and the first response to a concern by clarifying the issue, the immediate questions and where further review or action may be needed.
Ways to work with us
Most teams start by working through Ethics Insight. Where the task is clear and the engagement is appropriate, we can approve direct access to a defined part of Ranulph. We can also adapt parts of it to your own workflow.
You share the material and we do the review, ask the follow-up questions, and help turn the output into action.
Where the task is clear and the engagement is appropriate, we can approve direct access to one part of Ranulph.
Authorised users can open Ranulph ↗If you want Ranulph adapted or fitted to your own workflow or systems, we can explore that with you.
What it can and cannot do
Ranulph supports professional judgement; it does not prove misconduct or replace an investigation.
Use of Ranulph is arranged through Ethics Insight. If direct access is appropriate, we can set that up with you.
You may be testing an investment, reviewing fraud risk, dealing with overlapping requests or deciding how to respond to a concern. Tell us a little about the situation. We will tell you whether it makes more sense to work through Ethics Insight, set up approved direct access or adapt part of Ranulph to your own process.
Ranulph and Risko are UK registered trade marks of Ethics Insight Ltd.